Home DAC Arbitration
DAC Arbitration — The Heart of the Centre

Why wait years for justice,
when the law gives it to you in months?

Arbitration is not a compromise on justice — it is justice, delivered by the route Parliament built for it. Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as strengthened by successive amendments, a civil or commercial dispute can travel from reference to a binding, reasoned award within statutory timelines — and that award is enforceable exactly like a decree of the court. The Delhi Arbitration Centre administers this entire journey: a neutral institution, a panel led by Hon'ble former Judges, and a process monitored from the first request to the final award.

Commence an Arbitration DAC Rules & Fee Schedule
Time-Bound by StatutePleadings within six months (Sec. 23(4)); the award within twelve months of completing pleadings (Sec. 29A) — timelines written into the Act itself.
Enforceable as a DecreeUnder Section 36, the award is enforced under the Code of Civil Procedure as if it were a decree of the court.
Your Judge, Your ChoiceThe parties choose their tribunal — at DAC, from a panel of Hon'ble former Judges of the Supreme Court, High Courts and District Courts.
Confidential by LawSection 42A obliges the institution, the arbitrator and the parties to keep the proceedings confidential — privacy no open courtroom can offer.
The Problem With Waiting

The civil docket measures in decades. Your dispute cannot.

India's civil courts carry a pendency running into crores of cases. A commercial suit filed today must take its place in that queue — through summons, written statements, framing of issues, interminable adjournments, evidence, arguments and judgment — and then survive the ladder of appeals: first appeal, second appeal, and often a special leave petition beyond that. It is not unusual for a money dispute to consume a decade or more before the decree-holder sees execution. In that time, capital stays blocked, businesses close, witnesses fade, and the victory — when it finally comes — is often worth less than the wait.

This delay is not a defect of the judges, who preside over dockets no institution could clear. It is a defect of the route. And for arbitrable civil and commercial disputes, the law has already built a faster road.

The Statutory Foundation

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — a complete code

Arbitration in India is not an informal substitute for adjudication; it is a parallel statutory system, built on the UNCITRAL Model Law and administered as a complete code. The Act's architecture is deliberately designed to keep the dispute with the tribunal and out of the courtroom:

Party Autonomy — Sec. 7 & 19The parties' agreement is the constitution of the proceeding: they choose the tribunal, the procedure, the seat and the language.
Minimal Court Interference — Sec. 5No judicial authority may intervene except where the Act itself permits — the statute's opening promise.
The Tribunal Rules on Its Own Jurisdiction — Sec. 16Objections to jurisdiction are decided by the tribunal itself, not by a preliminary round of court litigation.
Interim Protection — Sec. 9 & 17Urgent protection is available from the court before the tribunal is formed, and from the tribunal thereafter — Section 17 orders are enforceable like court orders.
The Reasoned Award — Sec. 31The tribunal delivers a written, reasoned award — a speaking judgment on every claim, defence and counter-claim.
Finality & Enforcement — Sec. 35 & 36The award is final and binding, and is enforced under the CPC in the same manner as a decree of the court.
A Narrow Challenge — Sec. 34No appeal on merits exists; an award may be challenged only on limited, defined grounds — protecting the finality the parties bargained for.
Confidentiality — Sec. 42AThe institution, the arbitrator and the parties are bound by statute to maintain the confidentiality of the proceedings.
A Statute Sharpened by Reform

The amendments that turned arbitration into India's fastest remedy

The 1996 Act has been repeatedly strengthened by Parliament — each amendment aimed at the same twin goals: speed and institutional integrity.

The 2015 Amendment — the clock and the teeth

Section 29A wrote the twelve-month award timeline into the statute (extendable by six months by consent). The automatic stay of awards on a mere Section 34 challenge was abolished — award-holders could execute unless a court specifically stayed. Section 17 interim orders of the tribunal became enforceable like court orders, Section 31A introduced a costs-follow-the-event regime, and the Fifth and Seventh Schedules codified arbitrator independence.

The 2019 Amendment — institutions at the centre

Section 23(4) required statements of claim and defence to be completed within six months of the tribunal's appointment. Section 42A made confidentiality a statutory duty. The amendment's declared policy was to move Indian arbitration from ad hoc practice to administered, institutional arbitration — precisely the model DAC has operated since 2011.

The 2021 Amendment and the reform road ahead

The 2021 amendment protected award-integrity, permitting an unconditional stay where the award or the underlying agreement was induced by fraud or corruption. Reform continues: the draft Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2024 proposes statutory recognition of emergency arbitration and further strengthening of arbitral institutions — while the Supreme Court, including through its 2024 Constitution Bench ruling on unilateral appointments, has made institutional appointment the gold standard of validity.

The Case for Arbitration

Eight reasons the successful route runs through arbitration

SpeedStatutory timelines replace the open-ended docket: pleadings in six months, award in twelve — not terms, but law.
Choice of the Decision-MakerNo litigant chooses their judge; every arbitrating party does. At DAC that choice runs through Hon'ble former Judges and domain experts.
PrivacyCourt files are public; arbitration is confidential by statute. Commercial terms, business secrets and reputations stay protected.
FinalityOne tribunal decides the merits once. There is no first appeal, no second appeal, no re-trial of facts — only the narrow Section 34 review.
Procedural FlexibilityThe parties shape the procedure — documents-only or full hearings, physical or virtual, expedited or standard — the process fits the dispute.
Cost DisciplineCompressed timelines compress costs; institutional fee schedules make the expense predictable from day one, and Section 31A makes costs follow the event.
Expertise on the BenchConstruction, finance, IP, MSME, real estate — the tribunal can be chosen for its command of the subject, not assigned by roster.
Enforceability, Home and AbroadDomestically the award executes as a decree; internationally, the New York Convention carries it into more than 170 jurisdictions.
An arbitrator writing a reasoned award at the Delhi Arbitration Centre
The reasoned award — a speaking judgment on every claim, written to survive scrutiny and execute as a decree.
Administered by DAC

What institutional administration actually means

Anyone can benefit from DAC arbitration — from straightforward sales contracts to intellectual property matters, joint ventures, share-purchase arrangements and construction projects. The only requirement is consent: an arbitration clause in the contract, or an agreement to arbitrate made after the dispute has arisen. From that point, the difference between ad hoc arbitration and DAC's administered arbitration is the difference between travelling alone and travelling with an institution:

Monitored From Start to FinishDAC tracks every case from the Request for Arbitration to scrutiny of the draft final award, ensuring the proceeding advances at the right speed and in line with the Rules.
Valid Constitution of the TribunalAppointments are made by the institution from its panel — with written Section 12 disclosures — so the tribunal's validity, and the award's, is never in doubt.
Expedited & Summary ProcedureThe DAC Rules provide expedited and summary tracks — applied by default to Banking and NBFC matters — for disputes that need an award, not a saga.
Emergency ReliefA party needing urgent interim protection before the tribunal is formed may apply under the Emergency Arbitrator provisions of the DAC Rules.
Ethics of Natural JusticeEvery DAC arbitrator acts fairly, in good faith, without bias and in judicial temper — hearing both sides, never one behind the other's back, and disclosing every relevant interest.
Facilities & ODRHearing rooms at Tis Hazari, complete case administration, and online dispute resolution for parties and tribunals across geographies.

An arbitrator is never the representative of either party — even if nominated by one. At DAC, justice must not only be done; it must be seen to be done.

Rules & Fees

Transparent Rules. Published fees. No surprises.

Every DAC arbitration is governed by the DAC Rules of Arbitration — short, adaptable and aligned with international best practice — covering commencement, appointment, expedited and summary procedure, emergency relief, consolidation of connected disputes, conduct of hearings, and the making and scrutiny of the award. Fees are charged strictly as per the Centre's published Fee Schedule, calculated on the sum in dispute, so parties know the full cost of the proceeding before it begins.

The latest DAC Arbitration Rules and the Fee Schedule

The current DAC Rules of Arbitration and the complete Fee Schedule (including the subsidised schedule for Banking/NBFC matters) can be accessed from the Forms & Procedures section of this website.

Bring your dispute to the faster road

To commence an arbitration, adopt the DAC clause in your contracts, or enquire about the Rules, panel and fees, write to the Registrar, DAC. For the model arbitration clause, visit the DAC Clauses page.

Commence an Arbitration

[email protected]  ·  +91-9315100181  ·  +91-9315156330

logo
WhatsApp